SimpleSecure - Anyone got it working?

[uniprosper]

Hi,

I'm trying to use SimpleSecure on the server to send PGP encrypted messages via email.

I have a PGP windows shell installed on my home PC, and it's working fine. Using this system, I can encrypt/decrypt files/messages with no problems.

I am using version 2.6.3i (the international version of PGP)

However, when I install SimpleSecure and set the correct paths etc and try and use that to encrypt a message, I get an email back saying
Script Error: PGP produced no output when processing this message.
The most likely cause for this is that the PGP key you submitted
is invalid. (pgp_key submitted: Lee Benson <lee@uniprosper.com> ) A less likely
cause is that you did not specify the correct location of pubring.pgp
when setting up the script (pgp_config_files: ../simplepgp)"

I've tried changing and playing around with everything I can, but I still get this same error message. Any ideas?

Please let me know.
Thanks,
Lee.

------------------
=========================
http://www.uniprosper.com
=========================
"If at first you don't succeed,
call it Version 1.0"

[Terra]

FutureQuest has PGP 5.0 as the default... You can however switch to our PGP 2.6.3 version quite easily...

Follow along...

1) Telnet in to your account.
2) edit the '.bash_profile'
3) change the 'PATH=' line to include the path for pgp 2.6.3 binaries... e.g.
'PATH=$PATHHOME/bin' --> 'PATH=/usr/local/pgp263/binPATHHOME/bin'

You will then either have to source the new profile - or simply logout and log back in...

To test which PGP you are using, just type 'pgp' at the command line...

Hope this helps...

--Terra
--Self-Encrypting mentality--
FutureQuest.net

[uniprosper]

Hi,

I've got it working now, Thanks.
I love this PGP encryption!

Lee.

------------------
=========================
http://www.uniprosper.com
=========================
"If at first you don't succeed,
call it Version 1.0"

[Benson]

Glad it's working! I was thinking about playing around with it myself. However, I wonder - what is the more likely danger? Someone intercepting your unencrypted email, or someone snooping whilst your friend submits the mail form over an unsecured (non-SSL) link?

To me, the PGP/SSL combo would be a formidable (and relatively easy) security system for the small business site.

------------------
alba gu brath