FutureQuest, Inc. FutureQuest, Inc. FutureQuest, Inc.

FutureQuest, Inc.
Go Back   FutureQuest Community > General Site Owner Support (All may read/respond) > Open Discussions
User Name
Password  Lost PW

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-05-2001, 02:34 PM   Postid: 51060
bellgamin
Visitor

Forum Notability:
0 pts:
[Post Feedback]
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Ewa Beach, HI, USA
Posts: 175
Windows XP - firewall

The word I get is that WinXP will reject drivers it considers are -- uhh -- inappropriate. Among these are Zone Alarm and Blackice. Rumored reason is that XP comes equipped with its own Firewall. If true, we now know what MS has as the next target for oblivion -- competitive firewalls.

Any truth to all this?

Aloha,
Bell
bellgamin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2001, 02:57 PM   Postid: 51061
 Terra
CTO FutureQuest, Inc.
 
Terra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1998
Location: Z'ha'dum
Posts: 7,672
<Commentary>
There will be 3 Internets, as the world will know it:

1) Plain old Internet
2) AOL, Inc.
3) Microsoft .NET

#1 and #2 don't stand a chance...

They (Microsoft) will guarantee this by ensuring that the Microsoft firewall will only work with #3, while dropping every 1 of 1000 packets (with obligatory delay) on either #2 and #3...

FutureQuest.net is **slow**, but http://we.own.you.at.microsoft.com will be faster than greased lightning - so they **must** be better!

Looking deeper into my fantasy crystal ball, I see Cisco being consumed and the router IOS altered to give all Microsoft traffic a QOS priority of +10, while all the rest is -10... In court, they will say that it was only a 'default' setting and can be changed by any 20+ years experienced router veteran chanting in 1000 year old forgotten dialects...

Divide and Conquer is the Microsoft way, simple yet very very effective... If that doesn't work, then just throw lots and lots and lots and lots of money at it...
</Commentary>

--
Terra
--Time to start stocking the underground bomb shelter--
FutureQuest [does not endorse nor condone my crystal ball commentaries]
Terra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2001, 03:00 PM   Postid: 51062
Jeff
Site Owner
 
Jeff's Avatar

Forum Notability:
872 pts: Dignified Competence!
[Post Feedback]
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Great Lakes
Posts: 4,221
Seems like there would be some liability there...

If Microsoft will not allow you to run other firewall software, and your box gets exploited, wouldn't Microsoft be somewhat liable? After all, they took the ability and thus responsibility to secure your box out of your hands and into their own...

--risky business
Jeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2001, 03:04 PM   Postid: 51063
 Bob
Service Rep
 
Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 4,882
Wouldn't Life be Grand, if Microsoft was held liable for Anything

Just my two cents
Bob

- Throw enough Money at anything and it will get fixed! Bill Gates Motto
Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2001, 03:08 PM   Postid: 51064
 Terra
CTO FutureQuest, Inc.
 
Terra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1998
Location: Z'ha'dum
Posts: 7,672
"I dunno, Surprise Me!"

--
Terra
--/me ducks: The only expression a CEO needs to know--
FutureQuest
Terra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2001, 03:10 PM   Postid: 51066
 Deb
FutureQuest, Inc.
 
Deb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1998
Location: Franktown Colorado
Posts: 6,781
Quote:
"I dunno, Surprise Me!"
ROFL!!! If it works....

Deb
- Exposed
Deb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2001, 04:14 PM   Postid: 51069
PaulKroll
Mostly Harmless
 
PaulKroll's Avatar

Forum Notability:
367 pts: Community Guru
[Post Feedback]
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago, IL,USA
Posts: 1,866
This was announced on slashdot, to similar response. No one would accuse me of being a Microsoft fan, but this is all nonsense: current versions of zonelabs and blackice are effectively hacks: a version of Zonelabs that works with XP is allegedly already done, and black ice should be ready for XP "within a week" (it's software, so I'll assume that means "in a few weeks...") This is "drivers that have caused trouble in the past won't be able to do the same workarounds, they'll have to go through an API darn it" change, the same as we see all the time in OS upgrades.

Breathe, people, BREATHE...
PaulKroll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2001, 01:18 AM   Postid: 51079
bellgamin
Visitor

Forum Notability:
0 pts:
[Post Feedback]
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Ewa Beach, HI, USA
Posts: 175
Hmmm... maybe it IS an unfounded rumor. I picked it up from a forum populated by Linux geeks & security guys. Maybe they're wrong, but they sure sounded like they know what they're speaking of.
bellgamin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 AM.


Running on vBulletin®
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Hosted & Administrated by FutureQuest, Inc.
Images & content copyright © 1998-2013 FutureQuest, Inc.
FutureQuest, Inc.