FutureQuest, Inc. FutureQuest, Inc. FutureQuest, Inc.

FutureQuest, Inc.
Go Back   FutureQuest Community > General Site Owner Support (All may read/respond) > Open Discussions
User Name
Password  Lost PW

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-16-2003, 06:56 AM   Postid: 100507
phppete
Registered User
 
phppete's Avatar

Forum Notability:
238 pts: Ambassador of Goodwill
[Post Feedback]
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,489
Weird Referer

Date: 16th, Nov 2003 11:40 am
Referer: XXXX:+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++...
Entry Page: /detail.php...
Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
IP Address:cpc1-cmbg3-3-0-cust9.cmbg.cable.ntl.com

Why would the above visitor have a referer as XXXX:++++++++ ?? anyone know why that is?

Also I've noticed my site is being spider by Yahoo!'s new product engine but it identifies itself as IE5.5 as below:

Browser: YahooSeeker/1.0 (compatible; Mozilla 4.0; MSIE 5.5; http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/shop/merchant/)
IP Address:yj1002.inktomisearch.com

For those who wish to ensure SESSION ids are removed for bots/spiders and logs only contain humans (assuming you have set up your own tracking system), you should be aware of this bot 'pretending' to be a human... apparently this is Yahoo!s answer to Froogle which might suggest that Yahoo will be parting company with Google.... perhaps.

Pete
phppete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2003, 03:27 PM   Postid: 100516
kitchin
Site Owner

Forum Notability:
1163 pts: A True Crowd-pleaser!
[Post Feedback]
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,992
In some browsers & other software, you can set the Browser (User-agent) to whatever you want. Opera, for example.

Ad for the MSIE 5.5 string, it might be so it will pass browser detection on some sites. It's just saying it can handle the same content as Mozilla 4.0 and IE 5.5. No use indexing a page that says "this site requires Netscape 4 or IE 5.5 and above, please upgrade your browser!"
kitchin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2003, 03:40 PM   Postid: 100517
phppete
Registered User
 
phppete's Avatar

Forum Notability:
238 pts: Ambassador of Goodwill
[Post Feedback]
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,489
My theory is that Yahoo added MSIE IE5.5 to make it more tricky to detect it as a bot and to ensure it doesn't get blocked. Many people test the user agent by looking for MSIE, or maybe I'm just paranoid... I've stopped it triggering my logging class, since it won't be whipping out its Credit Card anytime soon I don't want it in my visitor logs!
phppete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2003, 04:15 PM   Postid: 100519
Randall
Fuzzier than thou
 
Randall's Avatar

Forum Notability:
1187 pts: A True Crowd-pleaser!
[Post Feedback]
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,640
Quote:
My theory is that Yahoo added MSIE IE5.5 to make it more tricky to detect it as a bot and to ensure it doesn't get blocked.
If that were the case, why bother identifying the source as "YahooSeeker"? They even give the URL for their FAQ, which tells you how to block the bot.

Randall
Randall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2003, 04:34 PM   Postid: 100520
phppete
Registered User
 
phppete's Avatar

Forum Notability:
238 pts: Ambassador of Goodwill
[Post Feedback]
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,489
I still stick by my theory.
phppete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2003, 11:57 PM   Postid: 100544
PaulKroll
Mostly Harmless
 
PaulKroll's Avatar

Forum Notability:
367 pts: Community Guru
[Post Feedback]
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago, IL,USA
Posts: 1,866
They did it for the same reason other bots still do it: because there are still a fair number of sites that give different content if they don't see at least a "Netscape 3" (compatible) user agent.
PaulKroll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2003, 03:23 AM   Postid: 100552
phppete
Registered User
 
phppete's Avatar

Forum Notability:
238 pts: Ambassador of Goodwill
[Post Feedback]
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,489
I forgot that some people still do that but these days I thought everyone designs properly. Are people using browser detection rather than object detection !
phppete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2003, 12:59 PM   Postid: 100575
kitchin
Site Owner

Forum Notability:
1163 pts: A True Crowd-pleaser!
[Post Feedback]
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,992
Quote:
Originally posted by phppete:
I still stick by my theory.
Then you won't want to click on that User-agent link from within your stats directory, because your browser will send a refer(r)er header, and, whoosh, Yahoo will know the address of your stats directory. Unless you've password-protected it.
kitchin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2003, 03:04 PM   Postid: 100592
phppete
Registered User
 
phppete's Avatar

Forum Notability:
238 pts: Ambassador of Goodwill
[Post Feedback]
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,489
Its not my stats directory, its a custom tracker for customers, I know every move they make and when

It has the usual password protection plus my own anti-hacker defences, it's hacker and script kiddie proof!

Pete
phppete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2003, 03:07 PM   Postid: 100593
 Terra
CTO FutureQuest, Inc.
 
Terra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1998
Location: Z'ha'dum
Posts: 7,674
Quote:
it's hacker and script kiddie proof!

LOL - quoted straight from the:
"Book of Famous Last Words"...

--
Terra
--for every lock you add, there are a thousand crackers with too much free time on their hands--
FutureQuest
Terra is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Running on vBulletin®
Copyright © 2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Hosted & Administrated by FutureQuest, Inc.
Images & content copyright © 1998-2013 FutureQuest, Inc.
FutureQuest, Inc.